//
archives

Ombuds and reviewers

This category contains 124 posts

Analysis: Richard Kirkham on the Government’s plans for consumer ADR: Innovation or more of the same

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skill (BIS) has issued its response on its consultation on proposals for upgrading the provision of alternative dispute resolution for consumers. The proposals were triggered by the EU Consumer ADR Directive, but at the same time map conveniently onto the Government’s current civil justice agenda of moving dispute resolution … Continue reading

Analysis: Patients’ Association takes PHSO to task on decision making

Margaret Doyle It is an ‘iceberg hidden beneath the cold unfriendly waters of the NHS complaints systems’, the final and fatal mix of a toxic cocktail where ‘complaints go unheard and lessons unlearned’. This is the damning conclusion of the Patients Association (PA) in a recently published report  on the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman … Continue reading

Analysis: What’s in a name? The challenges of terminology in studying ombuds practice

Varda Bondy, Margaret Doyle, and Carolyn Hirst   This month saw the publication of a Nuffield Foundation-funded mapping study on the use of informal resolution by ombudsmen (download here), launched at two events in London (at the Nuffield Foundation) and Edinburgh (at Queen Margaret University). Both were attended by practitioners and representatives from administrative justice fora from … Continue reading

News: PASC publishes “More complaints please!” on 14 April 2014

The House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee published its latest report about complaints on 14 April 2014. It concludes 82. The exposure of the failure of Mid Staffordshire Hospital, the Mid Staffordshire NHS Hospital Trust and of NHS leadership to hear both the complaints of patients and their families, and the complaints of their … Continue reading